Stocks Comparison
Smith & Wesson Brands vs Wrap Technologies: revenue, profit, margins and growth compared
Smith & Wesson Brands brought in $523.8M of revenue in fiscal 2026, Wrap Technologies $4.7M in fiscal 2025. Revenue changed by +10.4% at Smith & Wesson Brands and +3.7% at Wrap Technologies on the year before, so Smith & Wesson Brands grew faster. Smith & Wesson Brands kept 3.5% of its revenue as net profit, Wrap Technologies -221.2%. Free cash flow was $90.4M at Smith & Wesson Brands and -$10.4M at Wrap Technologies.
Side by side, latest fiscal year
| SWBI | WRAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal year ended | FY2026 (April 30, 2026) | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) |
| Revenue | $523.8M | $4.7M |
| Revenue growth | +10.4% | +3.7% |
| Net income | $18.5M | -$10.3M |
| Net margin | 3.5% | -221.2% |
| Free cash flow | $90.4M | -$10.4M |
| Free cash flow margin | 17.3% | -222.4% |
| Earnings per share (diluted) | $0.41 | -$0.22 |
| Cash | $28.2M | $3.5M |
| Debt | n/a | n/a |
| Price to earnings | 34.8 | n/a |
| Market value | $639.4M | $81.2M |
| Dividend yield | 3.65% | n/a |
| Rank by revenue in sector | #316 of 451 · Industrials | #434 of 451 · Industrials |
Over the years
Questions about Smith & Wesson Brands and Wrap Technologies
Which is bigger by revenue, Smith & Wesson Brands or Wrap Technologies?
Smith & Wesson Brands is bigger by revenue: $523.8M in fiscal 2026, against $4.7M for Wrap Technologies in fiscal 2025.
Which keeps more of its revenue as profit, Smith & Wesson Brands or Wrap Technologies?
Smith & Wesson Brands had a net margin of 3.5% in fiscal 2026; Wrap Technologies had -221.2% in fiscal 2025.
Which grew revenue faster, Smith & Wesson Brands or Wrap Technologies?
In their latest fiscal years revenue changed by +10.4% at Smith & Wesson Brands and +3.7% at Wrap Technologies.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the annual reports each company files with the SEC (10-K, or 20-F and 40-F for foreign companies), read from their XBRL data. Margins and growth are simple arithmetic on those figures. Nothing here is a recommendation.