Stocks Comparison
Microsoft vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing: revenue, profit, margins and growth compared
Microsoft brought in $331.8B of revenue in fiscal 2026, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing $88.3B in fiscal 2024. Revenue changed by +17.8% at Microsoft and +25.0% at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing on the year before, so Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing grew faster. Microsoft kept 40.3% of its revenue as net profit, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing 40.0%. Free cash flow was $67B at Microsoft and $26.5B at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing.
Side by side, latest fiscal year
| MSFT | TSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal year ended | FY2026 (June 30, 2026) | FY2024 (December 31, 2024) |
| Revenue | $331.8B | $88.3B |
| Revenue growth | +17.8% | +25.0% |
| Net income | $133.7B | $35.3B |
| Net margin | 40.3% | 40.0% |
| Free cash flow | $67B | $26.5B |
| Free cash flow margin | 20.2% | 30.1% |
| Earnings per share (diluted) | $17.95 | $1.36 |
| Cash | $20.9B | $64.9B |
| Debt | $40.3B | n/a |
| Price to earnings | 28.8 | n/a |
| Market value | $3.83T | $2.34T |
| Dividend yield | 0.71% | n/a |
| Rank by revenue in sector | #3 of 530 · Technology | #8 of 530 · Technology |
Over the years
Questions about Microsoft and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Which is bigger by revenue, Microsoft or Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing?
Microsoft is bigger by revenue: $331.8B in fiscal 2026, against $88.3B for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing in fiscal 2024.
Which keeps more of its revenue as profit, Microsoft or Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing?
Microsoft had a net margin of 40.3% in fiscal 2026; Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing had 40.0% in fiscal 2024.
Which grew revenue faster, Microsoft or Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing?
In their latest fiscal years revenue changed by +17.8% at Microsoft and +25.0% at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the annual reports each company files with the SEC (10-K, or 20-F and 40-F for foreign companies), read from their XBRL data. Margins and growth are simple arithmetic on those figures. Nothing here is a recommendation.