Stocks Comparison
CCSC Technology International vs Energy Focus: revenue, profit, margins and growth compared
CCSC Technology International brought in $17.3M of revenue in fiscal 2026, Energy Focus $3.6M in fiscal 2025. Revenue changed by -1.9% at CCSC Technology International and -26.7% at Energy Focus on the year before, so CCSC Technology International grew faster. CCSC Technology International kept -27.8% of its revenue as net profit, Energy Focus -28.8%. Free cash flow was -$5.4M at CCSC Technology International and -$1.5M at Energy Focus.
Side by side, latest fiscal year
| CCTG | EFOI | |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal year ended | FY2026 (March 31, 2026) | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) |
| Revenue | $17.3M | $3.6M |
| Revenue growth | -1.9% | -26.7% |
| Net income | -$4.8M | -$1M |
| Net margin | -27.8% | -28.8% |
| Free cash flow | -$5.4M | -$1.5M |
| Free cash flow margin | -31.0% | -41.0% |
| Earnings per share (diluted) | -$1.94 | -$0.18 |
| Cash | $4.1M | $1.1M |
| Debt | n/a | n/a |
| Price to earnings | n/a | n/a |
| Market value | $7M | $17.3M |
| Dividend yield | n/a | n/a |
| Rank by revenue in sector | #842 of 955 · Consumer discretionary | #913 of 955 · Consumer discretionary |
Over the years
Questions about CCSC Technology International and Energy Focus
Which is bigger by revenue, CCSC Technology International or Energy Focus?
CCSC Technology International is bigger by revenue: $17.3M in fiscal 2026, against $3.6M for Energy Focus in fiscal 2025.
Which keeps more of its revenue as profit, CCSC Technology International or Energy Focus?
CCSC Technology International had a net margin of -27.8% in fiscal 2026; Energy Focus had -28.8% in fiscal 2025.
Which grew revenue faster, CCSC Technology International or Energy Focus?
In their latest fiscal years revenue changed by -1.9% at CCSC Technology International and -26.7% at Energy Focus.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the annual reports each company files with the SEC (10-K, or 20-F and 40-F for foreign companies), read from their XBRL data. Margins and growth are simple arithmetic on those figures. Nothing here is a recommendation.