Stocks Comparison
Amc Entertainment vs Reading International: revenue, profit, margins and growth compared
Amc Entertainment brought in $4.8B of revenue in fiscal 2025, Reading International $203M in fiscal 2025. Revenue changed by +4.6% at Amc Entertainment and -3.6% at Reading International on the year before, so Amc Entertainment grew faster. Amc Entertainment kept -13.0% of its revenue as net profit, Reading International -7.0%. Free cash flow was -$365.9M at Amc Entertainment and -$2.9M at Reading International.
Side by side, latest fiscal year
| AMC | RDIB | |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal year ended | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) |
| Revenue | $4.8B | $203M |
| Revenue growth | +4.6% | -3.6% |
| Net income | -$632.4M | -$14.1M |
| Net margin | -13.0% | -7.0% |
| Free cash flow | -$365.9M | -$2.9M |
| Free cash flow margin | -7.5% | -1.4% |
| Earnings per share (diluted) | -$1.34 | -$0.62 |
| Cash | $428.5M | $10.5M |
| Debt | $4B | $185.1M |
| Price to earnings | n/a | n/a |
| Market value | $2.6B | $374.7M |
| Dividend yield | n/a | n/a |
| Rank by revenue in sector | #207 of 778 · Consumer discretionary | #653 of 778 · Consumer discretionary |
Over the years
Questions about Amc Entertainment and Reading International
Which is bigger by revenue, Amc Entertainment or Reading International?
Amc Entertainment is bigger by revenue: $4.8B in fiscal 2025, against $203M for Reading International in fiscal 2025.
Which keeps more of its revenue as profit, Amc Entertainment or Reading International?
Amc Entertainment had a net margin of -13.0% in fiscal 2025; Reading International had -7.0% in fiscal 2025.
Which grew revenue faster, Amc Entertainment or Reading International?
In their latest fiscal years revenue changed by +4.6% at Amc Entertainment and -3.6% at Reading International.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the annual reports each company files with the SEC (10-K, or 20-F and 40-F for foreign companies), read from their XBRL data. Margins and growth are simple arithmetic on those figures. Nothing here is a recommendation.