Stocks Comparison
Restaurant Brands International vs Yum China: revenue, profit, margins and growth compared
Restaurant Brands International brought in $9.4B of revenue in fiscal 2025, Yum China $11.8B in fiscal 2025. Revenue changed by +12.2% at Restaurant Brands International and +4.4% at Yum China on the year before, so Restaurant Brands International grew faster. Restaurant Brands International kept 8.2% of its revenue as net profit, Yum China 7.9%. Free cash flow was $1.4B at Restaurant Brands International and $840M at Yum China.
Side by side, latest fiscal year
| QSR | YUMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal year ended | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) |
| Revenue | $9.4B | $11.8B |
| Revenue growth | +12.2% | +4.4% |
| Net income | $776M | $929M |
| Net margin | 8.2% | 7.9% |
| Free cash flow | $1.4B | $840M |
| Free cash flow margin | 15.4% | 7.1% |
| Earnings per share (diluted) | $2.35 | $2.51 |
| Cash | $1.2B | $506M |
| Debt | $13.3B | n/a |
| Price to earnings | 30.5 | 16.1 |
| Market value | $32.6B | $13.9B |
| Dividend yield | 3.46% | 2.37% |
| Rank by revenue in sector | #123 of 778 · Consumer discretionary | #108 of 778 · Consumer discretionary |
Over the years
Questions about Restaurant Brands International and Yum China
Which is bigger by revenue, Restaurant Brands International or Yum China?
Yum China is bigger by revenue: $11.8B in fiscal 2025, against $9.4B for Restaurant Brands International in fiscal 2025.
Which keeps more of its revenue as profit, Restaurant Brands International or Yum China?
Restaurant Brands International had a net margin of 8.2% in fiscal 2025; Yum China had 7.9% in fiscal 2025.
Which grew revenue faster, Restaurant Brands International or Yum China?
In their latest fiscal years revenue changed by +12.2% at Restaurant Brands International and +4.4% at Yum China.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the annual reports each company files with the SEC (10-K, or 20-F and 40-F for foreign companies), read from their XBRL data. Margins and growth are simple arithmetic on those figures. Nothing here is a recommendation.