3M vs Stryker: revenue, profit, margins and growth compared
3M brought in $24.9B of revenue in fiscal 2025, Stryker $25.1B in fiscal 2025. Revenue changed by +1.5% at 3M and +11.2% at Stryker on the year before, so Stryker grew faster. 3M kept 13.0% of its revenue as net profit, Stryker 12.9%. Free cash flow was $1.4B at 3M and $4.3B at Stryker.
Fiscal years as each company reports them; the two may end in different months.
Questions about 3M and Stryker
Which is bigger by revenue, 3M or Stryker?
Stryker is bigger by revenue: $25.1B in fiscal 2025, against $24.9B for 3M in fiscal 2025.
Which keeps more of its revenue as profit, 3M or Stryker?
3M had a net margin of 13.0% in fiscal 2025; Stryker had 12.9% in fiscal 2025.
Which grew revenue faster, 3M or Stryker?
In their latest fiscal years revenue changed by +1.5% at 3M and +11.2% at Stryker.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the annual reports each company files with the SEC (10-K, or 20-F and 40-F for foreign companies), read from their XBRL data. Margins and growth are simple arithmetic on those figures. Nothing here is a recommendation.