Stocks Comparison
Kun Peng International vs Rocky Mountains: revenue, profit, margins and growth compared
Kun Peng International brought in $1.4M of revenue in fiscal 2025, Rocky Mountains $25K in fiscal 2026. Revenue changed by -30.8% at Kun Peng International and -17.0% at Rocky Mountains on the year before, so Rocky Mountains grew faster. Kun Peng International kept -87.8% of its revenue as net profit, Rocky Mountains -94.6%.
Side by side, latest fiscal year
| KPEA | RMGL | |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal year ended | FY2025 (September 30, 2025) | FY2026 (May 31, 2026) |
| Revenue | $1.4M | $25K |
| Revenue growth | -30.8% | -17.0% |
| Net income | -$1.3M | -$23.6K |
| Net margin | -87.8% | -94.6% |
| Free cash flow | n/a | n/a |
| Free cash flow margin | n/a | n/a |
| Earnings per share (diluted) | -$0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cash | $26.3K | $15.1K |
| Debt | n/a | n/a |
| Price to earnings | n/a | n/a |
| Market value | $12.8M | n/a |
| Dividend yield | n/a | n/a |
| Rank by revenue in sector | #559 of 605 · Industrials | #594 of 605 · Industrials |
Over the years
Questions about Kun Peng International and Rocky Mountains
Which is bigger by revenue, Kun Peng International or Rocky Mountains?
Kun Peng International is bigger by revenue: $1.4M in fiscal 2025, against $25K for Rocky Mountains in fiscal 2026.
Which keeps more of its revenue as profit, Kun Peng International or Rocky Mountains?
Kun Peng International had a net margin of -87.8% in fiscal 2025; Rocky Mountains had -94.6% in fiscal 2026.
Which grew revenue faster, Kun Peng International or Rocky Mountains?
In their latest fiscal years revenue changed by -30.8% at Kun Peng International and -17.0% at Rocky Mountains.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the annual reports each company files with the SEC (10-K, or 20-F and 40-F for foreign companies), read from their XBRL data. Margins and growth are simple arithmetic on those figures. Nothing here is a recommendation.