Stocks Comparison
Hilton Worldwide vs MGM Resorts International: revenue, profit, margins and growth compared
Hilton Worldwide brought in $12B of revenue in fiscal 2025, MGM Resorts International $17.5B in fiscal 2025. Revenue changed by +7.7% at Hilton Worldwide and +1.7% at MGM Resorts International on the year before, so Hilton Worldwide grew faster. Hilton Worldwide kept 12.1% of its revenue as net profit, MGM Resorts International 1.2%. Free cash flow was $2B at Hilton Worldwide and $1.5B at MGM Resorts International.
Side by side, latest fiscal year
| HLT | MGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal year ended | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) |
| Revenue | $12B | $17.5B |
| Revenue growth | +7.7% | +1.7% |
| Net income | $1.5B | $205.9M |
| Net margin | 12.1% | 1.2% |
| Free cash flow | $2B | $1.5B |
| Free cash flow margin | 16.8% | 8.3% |
| Earnings per share (diluted) | $6.12 | $0.76 |
| Cash | $918M | $2.1B |
| Debt | $12.4B | $6.2B |
| Price to earnings | 51.3 | 42.9 |
| Market value | $70.7B | $8.4B |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | n/a |
| Rank by revenue in sector | #106 of 778 · Consumer discretionary | #70 of 778 · Consumer discretionary |
Over the years
Questions about Hilton Worldwide and MGM Resorts International
Which is bigger by revenue, Hilton Worldwide or MGM Resorts International?
MGM Resorts International is bigger by revenue: $17.5B in fiscal 2025, against $12B for Hilton Worldwide in fiscal 2025.
Which keeps more of its revenue as profit, Hilton Worldwide or MGM Resorts International?
Hilton Worldwide had a net margin of 12.1% in fiscal 2025; MGM Resorts International had 1.2% in fiscal 2025.
Which grew revenue faster, Hilton Worldwide or MGM Resorts International?
In their latest fiscal years revenue changed by +7.7% at Hilton Worldwide and +1.7% at MGM Resorts International.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the annual reports each company files with the SEC (10-K, or 20-F and 40-F for foreign companies), read from their XBRL data. Margins and growth are simple arithmetic on those figures. Nothing here is a recommendation.