Stocks Comparison
Gilat Satellite Networks vs Vistance Networks: revenue, profit, margins and growth compared
Gilat Satellite Networks brought in $451.7M of revenue in fiscal 2025, Vistance Networks $1.9B in fiscal 2025. Revenue changed by +47.9% at Gilat Satellite Networks and +39.7% at Vistance Networks on the year before, so Gilat Satellite Networks grew faster. Gilat Satellite Networks kept 4.6% of its revenue as net profit, Vistance Networks 118.2%. Free cash flow was $9.2M at Gilat Satellite Networks and $252.6M at Vistance Networks.
Side by side, latest fiscal year
| GILT | VISN | |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal year ended | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) |
| Revenue | $451.7M | $1.9B |
| Revenue growth | +47.9% | +39.7% |
| Net income | $20.7M | $2.3B |
| Net margin | 4.6% | 118.2% |
| Free cash flow | $9.2M | $252.6M |
| Free cash flow margin | 2.0% | 13.1% |
| Earnings per share (diluted) | $0.34 | $9.63 |
| Cash | $168.9M | $613.5M |
| Debt | $2M | $7.3B |
| Price to earnings | n/a | 0.7 |
| Market value | $765.3M | $1.4B |
| Dividend yield | n/a | n/a |
| Rank by revenue in sector | #318 of 530 · Technology | #152 of 530 · Technology |
Over the years
Questions about Gilat Satellite Networks and Vistance Networks
Which is bigger by revenue, Gilat Satellite Networks or Vistance Networks?
Vistance Networks is bigger by revenue: $1.9B in fiscal 2025, against $451.7M for Gilat Satellite Networks in fiscal 2025.
Which keeps more of its revenue as profit, Gilat Satellite Networks or Vistance Networks?
Gilat Satellite Networks had a net margin of 4.6% in fiscal 2025; Vistance Networks had 118.2% in fiscal 2025.
Which grew revenue faster, Gilat Satellite Networks or Vistance Networks?
In their latest fiscal years revenue changed by +47.9% at Gilat Satellite Networks and +39.7% at Vistance Networks.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the annual reports each company files with the SEC (10-K, or 20-F and 40-F for foreign companies), read from their XBRL data. Margins and growth are simple arithmetic on those figures. Nothing here is a recommendation.