Stocks Comparison
GoDaddy vs Science Applications International: revenue, profit, margins and growth compared
GoDaddy brought in $5B of revenue in fiscal 2025, Science Applications International $7.3B in fiscal 2026. Revenue changed by +8.3% at GoDaddy and -2.9% at Science Applications International on the year before, so GoDaddy grew faster. GoDaddy kept 17.7% of its revenue as net profit, Science Applications International 4.9%. Free cash flow was $1.6B at GoDaddy and $577M at Science Applications International.
Side by side, latest fiscal year
| GDDY | SAIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal year ended | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) | FY2026 (January 30, 2026) |
| Revenue | $5B | $7.3B |
| Revenue growth | +8.3% | -2.9% |
| Net income | $875M | $358M |
| Net margin | 17.7% | 4.9% |
| Free cash flow | $1.6B | $577M |
| Free cash flow margin | 31.8% | 7.9% |
| Earnings per share (diluted) | $6.22 | $7.70 |
| Cash | $1.1B | $182M |
| Debt | $3.8B | $2.5B |
| Price to earnings | 15.6 | 17.2 |
| Market value | $12.3B | $5.6B |
| Dividend yield | n/a | 0.28% |
| Rank by revenue in sector | #93 of 530 · Technology | #65 of 530 · Technology |
Over the years
Questions about GoDaddy and Science Applications International
Which is bigger by revenue, GoDaddy or Science Applications International?
Science Applications International is bigger by revenue: $7.3B in fiscal 2026, against $5B for GoDaddy in fiscal 2025.
Which keeps more of its revenue as profit, GoDaddy or Science Applications International?
GoDaddy had a net margin of 17.7% in fiscal 2025; Science Applications International had 4.9% in fiscal 2026.
Which grew revenue faster, GoDaddy or Science Applications International?
In their latest fiscal years revenue changed by +8.3% at GoDaddy and -2.9% at Science Applications International.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the annual reports each company files with the SEC (10-K, or 20-F and 40-F for foreign companies), read from their XBRL data. Margins and growth are simple arithmetic on those figures. Nothing here is a recommendation.