Stocks Comparison
Enterprise Products Partners vs Williams Companies: revenue, profit, margins and growth compared
Enterprise Products Partners brought in $52.6B of revenue in fiscal 2025, Williams Companies $14.9B in fiscal 2025. Revenue changed by -6.4% at Enterprise Products Partners and +17.9% at Williams Companies on the year before, so Williams Companies grew faster. Enterprise Products Partners kept 11.0% of its revenue as net profit, Williams Companies 17.6%. Free cash flow was $3B at Enterprise Products Partners and $1B at Williams Companies.
Side by side, latest fiscal year
| EPD | WMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal year ended | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) |
| Revenue | $52.6B | $14.9B |
| Revenue growth | -6.4% | +17.9% |
| Net income | $5.8B | $2.6B |
| Net margin | 11.0% | 17.6% |
| Free cash flow | $3B | $1B |
| Free cash flow margin | 5.6% | 6.7% |
| Earnings per share (diluted) | n/a | $2.14 |
| Cash | $969M | $63M |
| Debt | $34.4B | $28.7B |
| Price to earnings | n/a | 32.2 |
| Market value | $79.1B | $84.4B |
| Dividend yield | n/a | 2.90% |
| Rank by revenue in sector | #2 of 125 · Utilities | #22 of 125 · Utilities |
Over the years
Questions about Enterprise Products Partners and Williams Companies
Which is bigger by revenue, Enterprise Products Partners or Williams Companies?
Enterprise Products Partners is bigger by revenue: $52.6B in fiscal 2025, against $14.9B for Williams Companies in fiscal 2025.
Which keeps more of its revenue as profit, Enterprise Products Partners or Williams Companies?
Enterprise Products Partners had a net margin of 11.0% in fiscal 2025; Williams Companies had 17.6% in fiscal 2025.
Which grew revenue faster, Enterprise Products Partners or Williams Companies?
In their latest fiscal years revenue changed by -6.4% at Enterprise Products Partners and +17.9% at Williams Companies.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the annual reports each company files with the SEC (10-K, or 20-F and 40-F for foreign companies), read from their XBRL data. Margins and growth are simple arithmetic on those figures. Nothing here is a recommendation.