Stocks Comparison
Coca-Cola Consolidated vs Mexican Economic Development: revenue, profit, margins and growth compared
Coca-Cola Consolidated brought in $7.2B of revenue in fiscal 2025, Mexican Economic Development $37.5B in fiscal 2024. Revenue changed by +4.8% at Coca-Cola Consolidated and -9.9% at Mexican Economic Development on the year before, so Coca-Cola Consolidated grew faster. Coca-Cola Consolidated kept 7.9% of its revenue as net profit, Mexican Economic Development 5.1%.
Side by side, latest fiscal year
| COKE | FMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal year ended | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) | FY2024 (December 31, 2024) |
| Revenue | $7.2B | $37.5B |
| Revenue growth | +4.8% | -9.9% |
| Net income | $570.6M | $1.9B |
| Net margin | 7.9% | 5.1% |
| Free cash flow | $619.6M | n/a |
| Free cash flow margin | 8.6% | n/a |
| Earnings per share (diluted) | n/a | n/a |
| Cash | $281.9M | $6.7B |
| Debt | $2.8B | n/a |
| Price to earnings | n/a | n/a |
| Market value | $12.7B | $40.8B |
| Dividend yield | n/a | n/a |
| Rank by revenue in sector | #30 of 93 · Consumer staples | #11 of 93 · Consumer staples |
Over the years
Questions about Coca-Cola Consolidated and Mexican Economic Development
Which is bigger by revenue, Coca-Cola Consolidated or Mexican Economic Development?
Mexican Economic Development is bigger by revenue: $37.5B in fiscal 2024, against $7.2B for Coca-Cola Consolidated in fiscal 2025.
Which keeps more of its revenue as profit, Coca-Cola Consolidated or Mexican Economic Development?
Coca-Cola Consolidated had a net margin of 7.9% in fiscal 2025; Mexican Economic Development had 5.1% in fiscal 2024.
Which grew revenue faster, Coca-Cola Consolidated or Mexican Economic Development?
In their latest fiscal years revenue changed by +4.8% at Coca-Cola Consolidated and -9.9% at Mexican Economic Development.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the annual reports each company files with the SEC (10-K, or 20-F and 40-F for foreign companies), read from their XBRL data. Margins and growth are simple arithmetic on those figures. Nothing here is a recommendation.