Stocks Comparison
Churchill Downs vs Canterbury Park: revenue, profit, margins and growth compared
Churchill Downs brought in $2.9B of revenue in fiscal 2025, Canterbury Park $59.6M in fiscal 2025. Revenue changed by +7.0% at Churchill Downs and -3.2% at Canterbury Park on the year before, so Churchill Downs grew faster. Churchill Downs kept 13.1% of its revenue as net profit, Canterbury Park -0.9%. Free cash flow was $699.6M at Churchill Downs and $4.7M at Canterbury Park.
Side by side, latest fiscal year
| CHDN | CPHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal year ended | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) |
| Revenue | $2.9B | $59.6M |
| Revenue growth | +7.0% | -3.2% |
| Net income | $383M | -$529.4K |
| Net margin | 13.1% | -0.9% |
| Free cash flow | $699.6M | $4.7M |
| Free cash flow margin | 23.9% | 7.9% |
| Earnings per share (diluted) | n/a | -$0.10 |
| Cash | $201M | $12.1M |
| Debt | $5.1B | n/a |
| Price to earnings | n/a | n/a |
| Market value | $5.6B | $81.8M |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | n/a |
| Rank by revenue in sector | #291 of 778 · Consumer discretionary | #713 of 778 · Consumer discretionary |
Over the years
Questions about Churchill Downs and Canterbury Park
Which is bigger by revenue, Churchill Downs or Canterbury Park?
Churchill Downs is bigger by revenue: $2.9B in fiscal 2025, against $59.6M for Canterbury Park in fiscal 2025.
Which keeps more of its revenue as profit, Churchill Downs or Canterbury Park?
Churchill Downs had a net margin of 13.1% in fiscal 2025; Canterbury Park had -0.9% in fiscal 2025.
Which grew revenue faster, Churchill Downs or Canterbury Park?
In their latest fiscal years revenue changed by +7.0% at Churchill Downs and -3.2% at Canterbury Park.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the annual reports each company files with the SEC (10-K, or 20-F and 40-F for foreign companies), read from their XBRL data. Margins and growth are simple arithmetic on those figures. Nothing here is a recommendation.