Stocks Comparison
Park Ha Biological Technology vs PROCTER & GAMBLE: revenue, profit, margins and growth compared
Park Ha Biological Technology brought in $2.5M of revenue in fiscal 2025, PROCTER & GAMBLE $87B in fiscal 2026. Revenue changed by +6.0% at Park Ha Biological Technology and +3.3% at PROCTER & GAMBLE on the year before, so Park Ha Biological Technology grew faster. Park Ha Biological Technology kept -965.0% of its revenue as net profit, PROCTER & GAMBLE 18.4%. Free cash flow was -$3K at Park Ha Biological Technology and $15.1B at PROCTER & GAMBLE.
Side by side, latest fiscal year
| BYAH | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal year ended | FY2025 (October 31, 2025) | FY2026 (June 30, 2026) |
| Revenue | $2.5M | $87B |
| Revenue growth | +6.0% | +3.3% |
| Net income | -$24.4M | $16B |
| Net margin | -965.0% | 18.4% |
| Free cash flow | -$3K | $15.1B |
| Free cash flow margin | -0.1% | 17.4% |
| Earnings per share (diluted) | -$41.38 | $6.62 |
| Cash | $3.8M | $9.9B |
| Debt | n/a | $29.3B |
| Price to earnings | n/a | 22.1 |
| Market value | $6.5M | $339.9B |
| Dividend yield | n/a | 2.91% |
| Rank by revenue in sector | #923 of 955 · Consumer discretionary | #9 of 955 · Consumer discretionary |
Over the years
Questions about Park Ha Biological Technology and PROCTER & GAMBLE
Which is bigger by revenue, Park Ha Biological Technology or PROCTER & GAMBLE?
PROCTER & GAMBLE is bigger by revenue: $87B in fiscal 2026, against $2.5M for Park Ha Biological Technology in fiscal 2025.
Which keeps more of its revenue as profit, Park Ha Biological Technology or PROCTER & GAMBLE?
Park Ha Biological Technology had a net margin of -965.0% in fiscal 2025; PROCTER & GAMBLE had 18.4% in fiscal 2026.
Which grew revenue faster, Park Ha Biological Technology or PROCTER & GAMBLE?
In their latest fiscal years revenue changed by +6.0% at Park Ha Biological Technology and +3.3% at PROCTER & GAMBLE.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the annual reports each company files with the SEC (10-K, or 20-F and 40-F for foreign companies), read from their XBRL data. Margins and growth are simple arithmetic on those figures. Nothing here is a recommendation.