Stocks Comparison
BETA Technologies vs AgEagle Aerial Systems: revenue, profit, margins and growth compared
BETA Technologies brought in $35.6M of revenue in fiscal 2025, AgEagle Aerial Systems $12.8M in fiscal 2025. Revenue changed by +136.0% at BETA Technologies and -4.3% at AgEagle Aerial Systems on the year before, so BETA Technologies grew faster. BETA Technologies kept -2,094.2% of its revenue as net profit, AgEagle Aerial Systems -41.2%. Free cash flow was -$313.2M at BETA Technologies and -$10M at AgEagle Aerial Systems.
Side by side, latest fiscal year
| BETA | UAVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal year ended | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) | FY2025 (December 31, 2025) |
| Revenue | $35.6M | $12.8M |
| Revenue growth | +136.0% | -4.3% |
| Net income | -$745.9M | -$5.3M |
| Net margin | -2,094.2% | -41.2% |
| Free cash flow | -$313.2M | -$10M |
| Free cash flow margin | -879.5% | -78.3% |
| Earnings per share (diluted) | -$12.85 | -$0.52 |
| Cash | $1.7B | $29.9M |
| Debt | $185.5M | $209.6K |
| Price to earnings | n/a | n/a |
| Market value | $5.6B | $62.4M |
| Dividend yield | n/a | n/a |
| Rank by revenue in sector | #412 of 451 · Industrials | #428 of 451 · Industrials |
Over the years
Questions about BETA Technologies and AgEagle Aerial Systems
Which is bigger by revenue, BETA Technologies or AgEagle Aerial Systems?
BETA Technologies is bigger by revenue: $35.6M in fiscal 2025, against $12.8M for AgEagle Aerial Systems in fiscal 2025.
Which keeps more of its revenue as profit, BETA Technologies or AgEagle Aerial Systems?
BETA Technologies had a net margin of -2,094.2% in fiscal 2025; AgEagle Aerial Systems had -41.2% in fiscal 2025.
Which grew revenue faster, BETA Technologies or AgEagle Aerial Systems?
In their latest fiscal years revenue changed by +136.0% at BETA Technologies and -4.3% at AgEagle Aerial Systems.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the annual reports each company files with the SEC (10-K, or 20-F and 40-F for foreign companies), read from their XBRL data. Margins and growth are simple arithmetic on those figures. Nothing here is a recommendation.